Problems with voting? Call the Election Protection hotline at 866-OUR-VOTE.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31, ruling that requiring non-members of public sector unions to pay fair share fees violates the First Amendment.  Kristen Clarke, President and Executive Director, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, issued the following statement:

“The Janus decision is an affront to the labor rights of public sector employees all across our country, particularly working-class families who are disproportionately minority. The ruling places corporate interests over the interests of some of the most vulnerable members of our workforce, including teachers, firefighters, police officers and other working-class employees who drive our economy.

“Remarkably, this ruling defies 41 years of legal precedent. It’s not every day that the Court overturns its prior and carefully considered decisions in the absence of a significant change of facts or circumstances. It raises questions about this Court’s commitment to the core principle of stare decisis.

“This decision will make it more difficult for public sector employees to protect their rights through union representation and will exacerbate the widening wealth gap between the haves and have nots in our country.”

The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law joined an amicus brief along with the National Women’s Law Center and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights.  The amicus brief notes the importance of unions as one of the most effective vehicles to move people into the middle class, especially for women and people of color.  This decision deals a large blow to the overall collective bargaining and political power on behalf of union members, including at the national level.  The weakening of public sector unions disproportionately impacts workers of color.  In 2016, African American men had the highest general union representation rate, followed by African American women.[1]

A decision in favor of AFSCME would have protected the current union funding system and helped unions to continue to protect the rights of marginalized individuals.  For instance, African American workers represented by unions, regardless of union membership status, had significantly higher median weekly earnings ($807 for represented members and $808 for union members) than their non-union counterparts ($646).[2]  Public sector unions supported by agency fees help communities of color increase their earning capacity and wealth, giving them a better shot to achieve financial security for their families and future generations.

_________________________________________________

[1] U.S. Dep’t of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Economic News Release, Table 1. Union affiliation of employed wage and salary workers by selected characteristics (Jan. 26, 2017) available at: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/union2.pdf.

[1] U.S. Dep’t of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Economic News Release, Table 1. Union affiliation of employed wage and salary workers by selected characteristics (Jan. 26, 2017) available at: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/union2.pdf.

[2] U.S. Dep’t of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Economic News Release, Table 2. Median weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers by union affiliation and selected characteristics (Jan. 26, 2017).